![]() If someone didn’t want distance out of their irons, they could look at the irons that are low on the vertical axis that are also as far left (short) as possible (AP1). For example, if someone wants the longest iron that also has a small shot area they could look at the irons that are low on the vertical axis that are also as far right (long) as possible (Cobra FLY-Z). Doing this would allow golfers to select an iron with the most important attributes to them. I would create a scatter diagram with distance of the long iron on the horizontal axis (164 to 174 yards) and average Z score for the mid and long iron shot areas on the vertical axis (-2 to 2). O One could look at the distance of the long irons, which is where most golfers looking for distance probably want it, and use it in conjunction with the shot area to evaluate the irons. Both of them use distance as a separate dimension for rating irons: Here are two proposals for how distance could be used in the rankings, especially given that shot area is the more important statistic. One could look at the distance of the mid irons (150-154 yards), but they are so similar that there isn’t really a meaningful difference. So, what is the best way to use distance in ranking these irons? One could look at the distance of the short irons (111-119 yards), but I don’t know anyone who is looking for more distance in their short irons. I am not one of those consumers, but I understand why they wanted to include it. MyGolfSpy wanted to include distance into the ratings because that is how iron sets are marketed and how some consumers evaluate iron sets.Very strong performer throughout the set.Extremely consistent and accurate in middle iron testing.Most forgiving in the long iron category.In terms of pure performance, it’s unquestionably the best in class. Overall #1 in short, middle, and long irons, TaylorMade’s RSi1 iron basically annihilated the field. Key data points and rankings for each iron tested are provided below in the sections below. Irons were evaluated for distance, accuracy, forgiveness, and consistency. The value presented is the standard deviation of carry distance (regardless of left/right dispersion). Carry Consistency is how we quantify forgiveness.A smaller value should be regarded as better. It provides the size (yards squared) of a 90% confidence ellipse (the area in which 90% of shots can expected to fall). Shot Area is a measure of the dispersion or consistency of each iron.Radial Distance (distance to the pin) is shown in feet.Distance (yards) is the average distance (regardless of left/right dispersion) for each iron. ![]() Launch monitor data along with the radial distance, shot area, and consistency calculations shown in each chart can be found on our 2015 Most Wanted Game-Improvement Iron data page. Here’s what you need to know in order to interpret our basic data and rankings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |